Thanksgiving Address and the Pledge of Allegiance

Author:
Updated:
Original:

The flare-up was predictable. Most tellingly it sprung up at Akwesasne,
Mohawk land, where the beacon light of Indian consciousness has flashed
before.

The board of education that oversees the 65-percent-Mohawk Salmon River
High School banned from its total school system an established morning
ritual: the recitation of the Haudenosaunee (Mohawk) Thanksgiving Address,
or "the words that come before all else." This blow to Mohawk pride and
identity caused quite a stir in the Akwesasne community, bringing to the
fore important questions of Native cultural existence in North America.

For local reporters, a sense of wonderment is expressed that a controversy
for once has arisen between Mohawks and a segment of the local white
establishment not involving gaming, land claims or contraband. This time
the issue is over a deeply-felt and these days more often-heard traditional
oration, one that is best given in the ancient language which, at
Akwesasne, many people -- particularly older adults -- speak and
understand.

As in all things Mohawk, the expression of the sovereign Indian culture is
at the forefront. Salmon River High School, for instance, flies three flags
at the same height: Mohawk, American and Canadian. The Mohawks have fought
hard to establish respect for their tribal sovereignty and cultural
heritage.

Established as a Jesuit-controlled village, Akwesasne (St. Regis Parish),
Catholicism on the Mohawk reservation was particularly harsh against
practitioners in the longhouse traditional ceremonies. Yet the ancient
practices survived; and as the younger generations graduated from college
while elders still conducted ceremonies, community consciousness about the
ancient culture forced the teaching of language, history and other Native
studies topics in the local curriculum.

On the same reservation, the Akwesasne Freedom School conducts a successful
Mohawk language immersion curriculum. The Thanksgiving Address, as recited
in Mohawk, is a centerpiece of the introduction and study of the language
there.

Conducted for more than three years, the community and students had come to
expect the recitation each Monday morning. As the message of the
Thanksgiving Address is completely positive and humanistic while
"addressing" higher beings, the Mohawks were proud to share it with
students from the local non-Indian families, and the hard-won right to be
represented and understood in the public sphere was enhanced.

The decision to deny the recitation of the address hit many Mohawks as
needless hostility. A school board member had complained that the address,
which mentions and gives thanks to a "Creator," violated the separation of
church and state. The board quickly banned the recitation out of hand.

Several hundred Mohawk students conducted rallies and civil protest against
the decision while the board denied any redress. Five sixth-graders were
suspended. Things got a bit hot. Mohawk families sued, arguing that a
reference to a "Creator" does not define the address as a prayer. This
hard-to-make argument reflects the fervor of the moment in the continuous
search for respect as tribal cultures.

Various definitions of prayer have, of course, arisen. The school board
itself opted to consult Webster's Dictionary, while Mohawk commentators
wonder why they did not consult the elder culture specialists in their
community. "There is no word for 'prayer' in our traditional language," one
parent told National Public Radio.

A clarifying argument focused on the Pledge of Allegiance, with its
unambiguous reference to a country "under God." What makes the Pledge of
Allegiance so sacrosanct, when a Mohawk cultural expression cannot be held
to be less unifying or humanistic? The pledge, community activists pointed
out, started out without referring to a "God," and was proclaimed in 1892
to celebrate the Columbus 400th Anniversary bash of the time. Only in 1954
were the words "under God" added in.

This interesting history is enough to lighten the discussion, except the
Mohawks are serious about their culture and its representation in
education: and the Thanksgiving Address is as central to the ancient
culture as anything one can find. Mohawk Chief James Ransom credits the
strength of traditional culture with his community's high rating for
college-level students.

While Ransom approached the matter with diplomacy, an Albany reporter cut
to the chase. "It's essentially about two different world views -- the
Mohawk's spirituality and the culture of white, Christian America ... [and]
... the affair has brought to the surface what Mohawks say are
centuries-old efforts by a dominant European society to obliterate the
American Indians' way of thinking." ("A test of Mohawk spirituality, God,
law: Tribal members contest school ban on traditional ritual, seek to halt
Pledge of Allegiance" by Rick Karlin, Albany Times-Union, Sept. 25.)

Some compromises are being heard now. The Salmon River schools have offered
a more private space for Mohawks and others. The legal matter persists. It
is an interesting case and reflects the Mohawk proclivity for focusing
issues that will widen across society.

As the Bush administration gleefully pushes the challenge to science from
creation-based sources, the assumption is that this reflects only the
biblical creation. Well, other peoples, among them traditional Native
practitioners and believers, have creation stories too. The variety of
creation and thanksgiving ceremonial traditions among Native peoples can no
doubt represent the widest imaginable rainbow of possibilities, if the
challenge is there to explain the spiritual nature of the universe
according to our own cultural traditions.

If the Pledge of Allegiance, complete with its reference to the Christian
deity, must be allowed in America's schools, so too must the ancient
Haudenosaunee Thanksgiving Address be allowed its reference to the
longhouse deity. Consistency of application of constitutional principles
and interpretations regarding the separation of church and state would
suggest, it seems obvious to us, either they both stay in or are both cast
out of the classroom.

Nobody denigrates here the Pledge of Allegiance -- the recent 100-year-old
statement of commitment means a great deal to many people -- but there is
nothing like the strength of a truly ancient expression of human connection
to the natural world as represented by this central Haudenosaunee oration.
The Thanksgiving Address, fixing the mind of the human being in the context
of the wondrous forces of nature that surround us and sustain us, is at
once mystical and deeply truthful. Beyond this particular controversy, we
submit, it deserves deep and abiding contemplation.