Skip to main content

Navajo take a sovereign stand against latest uranium scramble

WASHINGTON -- The global Cold War sparked the first uranium rush on Navajo
land in the 1950s -- and now a superheated global economy has threatened a
third.

Nuclear industry management has discredited the idea that a uranium "rush"
is on, noting that even as the per-pound price of uranium has climbed to
$35 from just over $7 four years ago, the industry's wages and insurance
costs are still much higher now than at the crest of the second national
scramble for uranium, in the late 1970s. A highly placed uranium executive,
quoted in a January Arizona Republic article, said the current intense
activity -- the newspaper reported that in 2005 alone, 700 mining claims
have been filed and 100 test holes bored in the high desert of Arizona, the
country's most uranium-rich state -- won't qualify as a uranium rush by
historical standards until prices reach $50 a pound.

On what they will call it when prices reach $500 a pound, no word. But one
industry analyst, quoted on the Internet at www.stockinterview.com, states
that it could happen. China, India and Japan are all competing for uranium
as they count on nuclear fuel to power their so-far successful commitment
to explosive economic growth on the Western model.

Considering its status as the planet's leading economic power, the United
States is poorly positioned to compete for uranium. It hasn't added to its
103 nuclear plants since 1978, and uranium mining has been stagnant since a
wave of bankruptcies closed out the second uranium rush in the 1980s.

Altogether, that means that as the United States prepares to establish a
new generation of nuclear power plants, futures contracts will be signed
for uranium supplies that are both scarce and in high demand, guaranteeing
the kind of competition that has driven prices for other energy resources
off the chart in recent years. Uranium, of course, is the heavy metal at
the heart of nuclear power; one pound of uranium "yellowcake" produces the
energy equivalent of many, many tons of coal -- as many as 15 train car
loads of coal, according to the U.S. Geological Survey as cited in the
Arizona Republic.

Scroll to Continue

Read More

And worthy of note here: That none of this information is the stuff of
standard headlines should lead no one to conclude it's not happening as
described. The headline seen around the world from President Bush's recent
State of the Union address, after all, was that America has an oil
addiction. By comparison, one of the remark's main intents -- to prepare
the ground policy-wise and grow public acceptance for a new chapter in U.S.
nuclear power -- passed almost unnoticed.

But the Navajo have been on notice for a long time. With extensive lands in
the leading uranium states of Arizona, New Mexico and Utah, the nation is
at the epicenter of the current uranium scramble. Mindful of the health and
environmental devastations visited on tribal members by the previous waves
of uranium mining, the nation last year enacted the Dine Natural Resources
Protection Act, banning uranium mining throughout its territories. More
recently, President Joe Shirley Jr. issued an executive order forbidding
conversation between tribal employees and energy industry representatives
on the subject of uranium exploration.

But the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has since dismissed arguments against
a uranium mining project based on water quality and groundwater
contamination, setting the table for mining the richest uranium vein in the
nation on lands that border Navajo territory. Under the recent NRC ruling
on a uranium mining application, such mining may also proceed on Navajo
allotted land. Because groundwater flows obey no imposed borders, this is
cause for continuing concern in a nation whose many victims of uranium
exposure (cancer and kidney damage are the leading afflictions) have never
been compensated and continue to suffer, according to community opinion,
grass-roots activists and many observers within the environmental and
health care communities.

In an interview that accompanied the Arizona Republic article in January,
Shirley expressed confidence that Navajo opposition to uranium mining will
not soften no matter how high uranium prices climb, and notwithstanding the
many Navajo members unemployed by the closure of Black Mesa coal mine. (The
announced cause of the closure was the cost of meeting environmental
standards.) "We're hurting for revenues, yes; we're hurting for jobs, but
we're not going to get into something that has killed us and will continue
to kill us," said Shirley.

Shirley and the nation have a history of commitment on the issue. In 2003,
about midway through the long, complex and embattled legislative process
that ultimately passed a national energy reform law, Shirley campaigned on
Capitol Hill against a then-provision "that invites uranium mining on the
Navajo Nation." Part of the campaign was to distribute a book, "If You
Poison Us: Uranium and Native Americans," among lawmakers and the media.