Skip to main content

Indigenous peoples fight for self-determination at U.N.

GENEVA -- It's been nearly 30 years since indigenous people began seeking
international support from the United Nations to secure basic human rights
that others take for granted -- the preservation of spiritual and cultural
identity, collective land and resource rights, and the right to exist as
nations and peoples, to name a few.

The fight for self-determination continues today, marked by heated debates
that opened the 11th session of the U.N. Working Group on the draft
Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. The present draft of the
declaration would require countries to give legal respect to the lands that
indigenous peoples hold collectively, including their aboriginal lands.
Fair claim systems are called for to deal with lands and resources taken in
the past.

The declaration must reach consensus in the Human Rights Commission of the
United Nations in the next year or two, or the effort will be likely be
abandoned by countries.

"One of the main reasons we are here is that U.S. law permits the
government to confiscate aboriginal Indian lands and resources, and it
permits unjustifiable federal control of Indian lands and resources," said
Robert "Tim" Coulter, an attorney who directs the Indian Law Resource
Center in Helena, Mont. and Washington, D.C.

"It is a state of almost complete lawlessness in the area of government
power over Indian property.

"What we want is the right of indigenous peoples, as distinct groups, to be
self-determining and self-governing in our own right, not only as part of
the countries where we are located. We are fighting to win a real right to
self-determination: to determine our own futures, our own laws, our own
development. This right is not fully recognized in international law. We
must now bring that into reality and make it part of international law and
domestic law as well."

The two-week session, held Dec. 5 -- 16, brought indigenous delegations
from throughout the world. Indigenous participants from the United States
included the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois Confederacy), the Navajo Nation, the
Citizen Potawatomi Nation, the Indian Law Resource Center, the Native
American Rights Fund, the International Indian Treaty Council, the Teton
Sioux Nation Treaty Council, the American Indian Law Alliance, the Inuit
Circumpolar Conference and the Indigenous World Association. All are
working to develop international law that protects and advances the rights
of American Indian nations and tribes.

While many countries participating in the session have agreed to recognize
a genuine right of self-determination for indigenous peoples, some fear
that indigenous nations may try to secede and form independent countries.
Deliberations are continuing on how to assure countries like the United
States, Indonesia, China, New Zealand and Australia that indigenous nations
will not disrupt their territorial integrity -- a legal principle that
holds no group has a legal right to break away and form an independent

Scroll to Continue

Read More

The United States government has joined with Australia and New Zealand in
proposing to redefine the right of self-determination with sharp limits.
The proposal was met with wide opposition and criticism by several
countries, including Mexico, Guatemala, Spain and Brazil.

"We should not be afraid of self-determination for indigenous peoples. In
many ways they have been wards of our governments as a result of
colonialism," said Mercio Gomez, head of Brazil's delegation.
"Self-determination means they have rights and responsibilities for the
welfare of their people and their cultures.

"We are not granting self-determination to indigenous peoples -- it is the
result of years of struggle on their part to rebuild their social,
political and cultural rights. I am dismayed that we would add restrictive
statements when we are turning toward a new era of self-determination for
indigenous peoples."

The original draft declaration of rights for indigenous peoples, crafted by
the Indian Law Resource Center in 1976, contained 10 points considered
critical to the survival of Indian nations. Over the years, the process
grew to include more than 100 indigenous groups, and a formal draft was
completed in the United Nations in 1993. The U.N. Commission on Human
Rights set up a working group in 1995 to review the draft, which is still
under discussion.

The declaration has since evolved into 19 introductory paragraphs and 45
articles covering a wide range of human rights related to religion,
language, lands, natural resources, education, and economic and social
issues. If adopted, it would be the most comprehensive statement on the
rights of indigenous peoples ever developed and would establish collective
rights unprecedented in international human rights laws.

The Dec. 8 and 9 meetings turned to the high-stakes issue of lands and
natural resources.

"We need more tribal government leaders here to help fight for our rights,"
said Coulter. "Even without being here, tribal leaders can help by
demanding that the United States give greater support to our right to
self-determination. We need international legal rights to help us protect
tribal rights in the U.S. system."

Though there is widespread support among countries for these provisions in
general, it remains to be seen how the final statement will read when
states finally reach consensus.

Valerie Taliman, Navajo, is director of communications for the Indian Law
Resource Center. For more information, visit