Skip to main content

Gun Lake Tribe questions congressman's Abramoff connection

BRADLEY, Mich. - Gun Lake Tribe Chairman D.K. Sprague has questioned a
possible link between Michigan Rep. Peter Hoekstra, who opposes the tribe's
proposed casino project, and indicted former lobbyist Jack Abramoff, whose
one-time lobbying firm contributed $2,000 to the congressman's election

In a press release issued Nov. 18, Sprague said he was "disappointed, but
not surprised" by the latest information to emerge from the Senate Indian
Affairs Committee's investigation into an expanding scandal of corruption,
fraud and political influence-peddling involving Abramoff and his partner,
Michael Scanlon.

The two men are accused of bilking six Indian tribes of more than $80
million over a three-year period. Some of the money was allegedly used to
influence legislative decisions that would stop rival tribes from opening
casinos that would siphon business from their clients.

Scanlon pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to violate federal
bribery, mail fraud and wire fraud laws Nov. 21.

Dave Yonkman, Hoesktra's communications director, said the congressman
denied the allegation that the campaign contribution from Abramoff's former
lobbying firm Greenberg Traurig was in exchange for opposition to the Gun
Lake Tribe's casino.

"Congressman Hoekstra has been a long-time opponent of Indian gaming. He is
representing his constituents in that position. There is no connection
between Peter Hoekstra and Jack Abramoff," Yonkman said.

Jill Perry, a Greenberg Traurig LLP spokesman, said the $2,000 contribution
was paid to Hoesktra on the recommendation of Nancy Taylor, a lobbyist at
the firm who represents rural health care issues.

The Gun Lake Tribe's statement asserts that Abramoff sent e-mails in 2002
to Council of Republicans for Environmental Advocacy President Italia
Federici, urging her to convince her friend J. Steven Griles, then the
Interior deputy secretary, to stop the Gun Lake Tribe's plans to open a
casino near Grand Rapids, Mich. Abramoff reportedly sought to block the Gun
Lake casino because it would threaten the market share of the nearby
Soaring Eagle Casino operated by his clients, the Saginaw Chippewas.

Scroll to Continue

Read More

Hoekstra wrote to Interior Secretary Gale Norton on Dec. 12, 2002,
requesting an extension of the comment period on Gun Lake's environmental
review for its land-into-trust application. The 300-member tribe, which was
granted federal acknowledgement in 1999, does not have a reservation.

The next day, Abramoff's office received a fax from Hoesktra's office
informing him that the extension request letter was sent to Norton,
according to the Gun Lake Tribe statement. Days later, Interior agreed to
add an additional 45 days to the usual 30-day public comment period.

Abramoff wrote to Federici about the extension in an e-mail on Dec. 19,
2002: "This is very good. With this extension they can now kill it [the Gun Lake casino project] by ruling that the Environmental Impact Statement
shows they should not move forward."

"Great!" Federici replied.

Hoekstra later received two $1,000 election campaign contributions from
Greenberg Traurig, Abramoff's former lobbying firm.

"The influence-peddling that was used to delay our application was
unethical and disgraceful. It's truly disheartening to learn that
Congressman Hoeskstra was cooperating with Abramoff to delay our
application and then accepted money from Abramoff's firm. All of those
involved must be held accountable. My tribe has suffered enough delay. This
project should move forward now," Sprague said.

Interior approved the tribe's land-into-trust application, but a political
action committee called "23 is Enough," comprised of wealthy business
owners who oppose the tribe's plans, has appealed the decision.

Hoekstra is a member of 23 is Enough.

Asked if the congressman's membership in that committee presented a
conflict of interest, Yonkman said, "The question has never been raised
before. Congressman Hoekstra believes it is another effort for him to
oppose the expansion of Indian casinos in Michigan."